clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws and Journals, 1982, August Special Session
Volume 743, Page 318   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
Aug. 6
92 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS
OBTAIN WORK AND THE INDIVIDUAL PROVIDES TANGIBLE EVIDENCE OF
SUCH EFFORT. (II)  AN INDIVIDUAL SHALL BE DISQUALIFIED
FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS FOR ANY WEEK OF UNEMPLOYMENT IN HIS
ELIGIBILITY PERIOD DURING WHICH HE FAILS TO ACCEPT ANY OFFER
OF SUITABLE WORK OR FAILS TO APPLY FOR ANY SUITABLE WORK TO
WHICH HE IS REFERRED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. THE
DISQUALIFICATION SHALL THEREAFTER CONTINUE UNTIL THE
INDIVIDUAL HAS BEEN EMPLOYED DURING AT LEAST 4 WEEKS WHICH
BEGIN AFTER HIS FAILURE TO APPLY FOR OR ACCEPT SUITABLE WORK
AND HAS EARNINGS THEREIN EQUAL TO AT LEAST 4 TIMES HIS
WEEKLY ADDITIONAL BENEFIT AMOUNT. (III)  FOR THE PURPOSES OF SUBPARAGRAPH
(II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH (4), "SUITABLE WORK" MEANS: 1. THE WORK IS WITHIN THE
INDIVIDUAL'S CAPABILITIES; 2. THE GROSS AVERAGE WEEKLY REMUNERATION PAYABLE FOR THE WORK EXCEEDS THE SUM OF THE
INDIVIDUAL'S WEEKLY ADDITIONAL BENEFIT AMOUNT PLUS ANY
SUPPLEMENTAL UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BENEFITS (AS DEFINED
IN SECTION 501(C)(17)(D) OF THE FEDERAL INTERNAL REVENUE
CODE) PAYABLE TO THE INDIVIDUAL FOR THE WEEK; 3. WAGES FOR THE WORK ARE EQUAL TO
OR EXCEED THE HIGHER OF THE MINIMUM WAGE PROVIDED BY SECTION
6(A)(1) OF THE FEDERAL FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938,
WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY EXEMPTIONS, OR ANY APPLICABLE STATE OR
LOCAL MINIMUM WAGE; 4. THE WORK IS LISTED WITH THE
DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICE OR IS OFFERED TO THE
INDIVIDUAL IN WRITING; AND 5. THE WORK IS SUITABLE UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 6(D) OF ARTICLE 95A TO THE EXTENT THAT
SUCH PROVISIONS ARE NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
ITEMS 1 THROUGH 5 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH (III).". Delegate Masters moved the previous question. The motion was adopted. Delegate Neall's amendments were read and rejected by a roll
call vote as follows: Affirmative: 32                                                                 Negative: 106 (See Roll Call No. 2134) AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL NO. 1


  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws and Journals, 1982, August Special Session
Volume 743, Page 318   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives