Volume 723, Page 254 View pdf image |
(254) Frederick County planter of the first Part Joshua Graves of S.t Marys County Planter of the Second Part and Henry Jarbeo of S.t Marys County Planter of the third part Whereas by Agreement between the said Parties for the docking baring and extinguishing all Estates tail and revertions and remainders thereupon expectant or depending of and in the Lands and Appurtenances herein after mentioned the said Henry Jarbeo as Demandant did heretofore prosecute and sue forth out of his Lordships High Court of Chancery his said Lordships Writ of Entry sur Disseisin en le post against him the said Joshua Graves Tenant returnable and returned to the Last September Provincial Court whereby the Said Henry Jarbeo did demand against him the said Joshua Graves All that Ten Acres of Land Part of a Tract of Land called Hardship's Addition lying in S.t Marys County the said Ten Acres being contained within the following Lines to wit Beginning at the beginning of the given Line of the said whole tract and running therewith Sixty Perches then North Sixty Seven Degrees and an half Degree East twenty Seven perches then South Sixty perches and from thence to the beginning And also all that Tract or Parcel of Land lying in the county aforesaid called Hopewell containing three Hundred and fifty Acres of Land excepting thereout one hundred and fifty Acres of Land Sold and Conveyed to William Bullock the said one hundred and fifty acres beginning at a bounded white oak and running thence West eighty four perches and from thence to the Beginning with ^the^ appurtenances the said demanded Lands and Premisses then being in the actual seisin of the aforesaid Joshua Graves to which said Writ of Entry the said Joshua Graves did appear and vouch to warranty thereof the aforesaid Thomas Graves who also appeared and vouched to Warranty thereof the common Vouchee of the Same Court and such further and other Proceedings were had that the said Henry Jarbeo by Judgment of the same court did recover his seisin against the said Joshua Graves of and in the said demanded Premisses and the said Joshua Graves did recover in Value against the said Thomas Graves who also recovered in Value against the Common Vouchee whereby a good and perfect common Recovery with Double Voucher over hath been (had) |
||||
Volume 723, Page 254 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.