MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 151

Wherefore the plantiff by Will^m Bladen his Attorney prays that Execution
may be done as in Writt Laid.

It is therefore considered by the Court here the day and Year last men-
tioned that the said Hugh Hall Administrator as aforesaid have Execution of
the Judgm^t aforesaid so obtaind as aforesaid against the said Magdalen Ed-
mondson Administratrix as Aforesaid of the goods and chatties Which were
of the said James Edmondson Son and heir of the said John Edmondson to
witt as well of the [223] Sume of Fifty four pounds Eight shillings and three
pence the Debt aforesaid togeather with the Sume of Six hundred and
ninety one pounds of tobaccoe costs of suite as the Summe of Six hundred
and Forty two pounds of tobaccoe Additionall costs Accruing upon this writt
of Scire facias to be leavyd of the goods and Chatties which were of the said
James the Son and heir Aforesaid at the time of his death in the hands of
the said Administratrix remaining to be Administred etc.

In Testimony whereof the Seale of the Provinciall Court is hereunto
Affixed

per Jn^o Beale Clr Prov^l Co--^t

James Edmondsons Ad^rs v Hugh Halls Adm^rs

Errors Assigned on the Judgment rendred in the Provinciall Court for
Halls Administrators against Edmondsons Administrat^rs Viz^t

Afterwards to witt the Eighteenth day of Aprill Anno Domini Seaven-
teen hundred and twelve before the President of her Majestys Councill of
Maryland and the same Councill sitting at the City of Annapolis the afore-
said Jacob Lockerman and Magdalen his wife by Thomas Bordley their At-
torney comes and says that in the Record and process and also in the rendring
the Judgment aforesd and Awarding Execution thereupon against the said
Magdalen in forme aforesaid it is Manifestly Erred

1^th In That it appears by the Record that the said Hugh Hall Adm^r
brought Action of Debt against James Edmondson Son and heir of John
Edmondson in the Debet and detinet which is contrary to the formes in the
Register and should be in the detinet only also.

2^dly In that the said Hugh Halls Administrator declared not by way
of recitall as in debt on Specialty he ought

3^dly Also in that the Court Exparte did order Comission to Aditours
[sic] to Examine the Accounts between the said partys which ought [224] not
to have been in that Action without the consent of both partys at the least

4^thly Also in that the Court gave Judgment upon the report of the Audi-
tors Comissionated as aforesaid for A Sume neither claimd by the plantiff
Warranted by the Obligation nor contest by the Defendant

5^thly Also in that the Judgment entred is absolutely against the said
James Edmondson the heir of John the Obligor for the Summe therein men-
tiond without limitting how the sd Sume Should be leavyed.