Volume 861, Page 95 View pdf image |
March
Court
1740
95 Chattles which were of the within mentioned Hugh Porter at the time of his death in their hands to be administred within my bailywick whereof I could make the within mentioned Sixty pounds Curr.t money of Maryland and three hundred and seventy Eight pounds of tobacco or any part thereof but divers goods and Chattles which were of the said Hugh Porter at the time of his to the value of Sixty pounds Current money and three hundred and Seventy Eight pounds of tobacco to the hands of the said George Bounds and Mary his wife after the death of the said Hugh to be administred Came which goods and Chattles the said George Bownds and Mary his wife afterwards and before the return of this writt did was Eloin and to their proper use Convert and I further Certifie to the Justices within Named that the within Geo Bownds and Mary his wife have no goods and Chattles in my bailywick whereof I Can make the damages in the within Writt Mentioned as by the same writt I am Commanded
forty to answer unto William Whittington of a plea of trespass upon the Case &c And the same day is given to the af.d William here &c Att which day here Came the af.d William Whittington by Francis Allen his Attorney and the sheriffe to witt John Handy Gent now here returned that he had taken the af.d John Martin whose body here at this day he had ready to answer the af.d William Whittington of the af.d plea as to him it was Commanded Whereupon the said John Martin puts in his place George Douglas Gent attorney at Law against the aforesaid William Whittington of the aforesaid plea And thereupon at the request of the Parties aforesaid day is to them now here given untill next Court to be held at dividing Creek the third Tuesday of March then next following in the same state as at present saving to the parties aforesaid Att which day here Came againe the aforesaid John Martin by his attorney aforesaid and the aforesaid William Whittington then and there his writt aforesaid against the aforesaid John Martin did not prosecute with effect but Voluntarily permitted his suit to be discontinued Therefore afterwards to witt that same day Last abovesaid by discretion of his 161 Lordships Justices here were adjudged the same John Martin for his Costs and Charges by him about his defence in that part sustained according to the form of the statute in such Case Lately made and provided and the aforesaid William in Mercy and the aforesaid John have thereof Execution &a
Leveyed |
|||||
Volume 861, Page 95 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.