| Volume 861, Page 197 View pdf image |
|
November
Court
1741
197 af.d Expended and the said Robert Sundry Sums of money in his defence in the said plea Expended and so the said Daniel did not indemnify the said Robert by means of his so as af.d becomeing bound whereupon the said Robert says he is damnifyed one hundred and thirty pounds Curr.t money of Maryland and thereof he brings Suit &c Pledg.s &.c J Doe & R Roe And the af.d Daniel Cordery by his Attorney af.d Comes and defends the force and Injury when &c And prayeth leave thereof to Imparle hereuntill next Court to be held at dividing Creek the third Tuesday of June then next Following and he hath it and the same day is given to the af.d Robert here &c Att which day here Came again as well the af.d Robert Smith as the af.d Daniel Cordery by their attorneys af.d and whereupon as well the af.d plantiffe as the af.d defendant Submitted their dispute in this Action to the Arbitrament and finall determination of Robert Jenckins Henry George Douglas and William Arbuckle or any two of them of Somerset County Gentlemen and it is agreed by and between the said plantiffe and defendant that the af.d Arbitrators or any two of them return their Arbitrament in writing under their hands and seals to the Justices of his Lordships County County Court of Somerset to be held at dividing Creek in and for the County af.d the third Tuesday of August then next Following that the same Justices may proceed thereon to Judgment against Either of the parties af.d as if the Cause were determined by this Court and it is further agreed by the parties af.d that that Submission af.d may ^be^ made a rule of this Court Therefore it is Ordered that the Submission af.d in manner and form af.d made According to the form and Exffect of the statute in that Case lately made and provided be entred and made a rule of this Court on the motion of the parties af.d And the same day is given to the ^same^ plantiffe and defendant here &c Att which day here Came again as well the af.d plantiffe as the af.d defendant in their proper persons and the af.d Arbitrators sent not here their arbitrament in the premisses af.d between the same plantiffe and defendant af.d Thereupon further day is given to the af.d Arbitrators to make their Arbitrament in the premisses af.d between the parties af.d so that they the said Aribtrators or any ^two^ of them return their Arbitratment in writing under their hands and seals to the Justices of his Lordships County Court of Somerset to be held at dividing Creek in and for the County af.d the third Tuesday of November next Following And the same day is given to the same plantiffe and defendant here &c Att which day here Came as well the af.d plantiffe & the af.d defendant in their proper persons and hereupon Robert Jenckins Henry George Douglas and William Arbuckle the Gentlemen [illegible] likewise Came and made return of their Arbitrament in the premisses af.d Between the parties af.d in manner Following In pursuance of a rule of Somerset County Court According to the form of the Statute and the power to us thereby given in a Cause there |
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 861, Page 197 View pdf image |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.