clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Kent County Court, Proceedings, 1718-1720
Volume 833, Page 80   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
   80                                       June Court 1718
   [Va]lentine Browne | T: C: - | Chr Bateman . | T: C Decln
            at | Contd. |         at |    Abates —
   John Johnson—— |
| William Turner |
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~


~~~~~~~~~~

   Jedidiah Andrews | And the afd Defts by Michael Howard their
           at | attry come and defend the force and injury when
   Daniel Pearce & Thoms. |    And Saith that the writ of Scire facias afd
   [Co]oke Spl. baile Chr Philipson | in manner and forme afd forth of the Said Court
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Issued and prosecuted and the matter in the Said
   writ Contained is not Sufficient in Law for the Said Plt~ his Execution afd
   of the afd Debt & Costs against them the Said Defts to have and maintain
   and that they the Said Defts to the Said writ of Scire facias in manner &
   forme afd prosecuted have not need nor by the Law of the Land are held
   to Answer wherefore the Said Defts pray Judgment of the writ of Scire facias
   afd and that the Said Plt.
        Memorandum the afd Entrd by a mistake
   Daniel Pearce & Tho Cooke | And the afd Daniel Pearce & Thomas
   Spl baile Chr Philipson | Cooke by Thomas Bowne their attry comes
           ads | and prays Judgment of the afd writ of Scire
   Jedidiah Andrews — | facias because he Saith that there is not
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
any mention made of any Ca Sa in the Said
   Scire facias against the Said Christopher Principall in the orriginall
   Judgment which by Law ought to have been which the Said Daniel
   Pearce and Thomas Cooke are ready to verefie Wherefore they pray
   Judgment of the Said Writ of Scire facias &ca    TBowne pr Defts
      And the afd Plt Saith that by any thing by the afd Defts above pleaded
   alleadged from his Execution afd against them to have ought not to be—
   precluded because he Saith that the plea afd by them the Said Defts in
   manner & forme afd above pleaded and the matter in the Same Contained
   is insufficient in Law for him the Said Plt~ from his Execution afd against
   them to have to be precluded to which the Said Plt hath no necessity nor by
   the Laws of the Land is he holden in any manner of wise to make answer
   unto And this he is ready to verefie Wherefore for want of a Sufficient answer
   in this behalfe he prays Judgment & Execution to be awarded with his ——
   damages to him to be adjudged    Johnson pr plt~
     Demurrer Joyned    TBowne pr Defts
   Which Plea and Demurrer afd being read and mature deliberation being
   by the Court thereupon taken The Court adjudges the Plts Demurrer good
   and Sufficient in Law And that the plea afd is held for naught~
                                                                                                     rule



  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Kent County Court, Proceedings, 1718-1720
Volume 833, Page 80   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives