|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ch. 204 2000 LAWS OF MARYLAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan State University Review
conducted by James L. Fisher LTD from
November 1999 to February 2000. The
Action Plan should include timetables and
benchmarks, and identify the party
responsible for implementing each
element. The Action Plan should address
all of the recommendations made in th
February 2000 report, including the
following areas: (1) general condition of
the University: (2) academic programs: (3)
faculty: (4) student services and financial
aid: (5) administration; (6) budget and
financial management, (7) private support
and outside grants: (8) public relations: (9)
governance: and (10) other issues raised
during the course of the review. The Action
Plan should also address any
recommendations with which the
University does not agree. The budget
committees shall have 45 days to review
and comment on the Action Plan.
Further provided that it is the intent of the
General Assembly to initiate a review of
the University's implementation of the
recommendations and the University's
Action Plan by an outside consultant
selected by the General Assembly in
consultation with the University and the
Maryland Higher Education Commission,
in 2001, provided that it is the intent of
the General Assembly that, consistent
with the development of the updated
Statewide Plan for Higher Education
and revised campus mission
statements, the Board of Regents of
Morgan State University shall provide
to the Maryland Higher Education
Commission, the Senate Budget and
Taxation Committee, the Senate
Economic and Environmental Affairs
Committee, and the House
Appropriations Committee not later
than October 15, 2000, a strategic
plan of action for implementing the
recommendations of the university
review performed by James L. Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1130 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
