clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1589   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                             Ch. 283
SUFFICIENT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE RESPONDENT BUSINESS ENTITY HAS NOT
DISCRIMINATED AGAINST SUCH PROTECTED CLASS IN THE OVERALL CONTEXT OF
ITS BUSINESS; AND (6) ANY OTHER EVIDENCE DEEMED RELEVANT BY THE ATTORNEY (B) BASED ON THE OFFICE'S REVIEW AND INVESTIGATION, THE OFFICE
SHALL MAKE AN INITIAL FINDING OF EACH ALLEGATION STATED IN THE
COMPLAINT, THAT EITHER: (1)      THE INVESTIGATION PRODUCED SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO FIND
THAT THE ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION OR RETALIATION DID TAKE PLACE
("SUSTAINED"); (2)      THE INVESTIGATION FAILED TO PRODUCE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
TO FIND WHETHER THAT THE ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION OR RETALIATION TOOK
PLACE ("NOT SUSTAINED"); (3) THE INVESTIGATION PRODUCED SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO FIND
THAT THE ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION OR RETALIATION DID NOT TAKE PLACE
("UNFOUNDED'')
; (4) (3) THE INVESTIGATION PRODUCED SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO
ESTABLISH THAT THE COMPLAINANT KNOWINGLY MADE ONE OR MORE FALSE OR
FRIVOLOUS ALLEGATIONS, AND FURTHER INVESTIGATION DID NOT APPEAR LIKELY
TO PRODUCE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT THE ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION OR
RETALIATION DID TAKE PLACE ("FALSE OR FRIVOLOUS"); (5) (4) THE ALLEGATION HAS BEEN SETTLED OR OTHERWISE
RESOLVED WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT BUSINESS ENTITY, THE
COMPLAINANT, AND THE STATE ("SETTLED"); OR (6) (5) THE ALLEGATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN WITH THE
APPROVAL OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
("WITHDRAWN"). (C) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL APPROVE THE WITHDRAWAL OF AN
ALLEGATION BY THE COMPLAINANT UNLESS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DETERMINES
THAT PERMITTING THE WITHDRAWAL IS NOT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE
STATE.
(D) IF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DETERMINES THAT THE COMPLAINANT'S
WITHDRAWAL OF AN ALLEGATION IS NOT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE STATE,
THEN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY CONTINUE THE INVESTIGATION WITHOUT THE
COMPLAINANT'S PARTICIPATION AS A PARTY.
(C) THE OFFICE SHALL MAKE THE INITIAL FINDINGS UNDER SUBSECTION (B)
OF THIS SECTION BASED ON A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE. (E) (D) ON COMPLETION OF ITS INITIAL INVESTIGATION, THE OFFICE SHALL
RECOMMEND TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMISSION THE APPROPRIATE ACTION
TO BE TAKEN, INCLUDING: - 1589 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1589   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives