clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1590   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
Ch. 283                                    2006 LAWS OF MARYLAND
(1)      ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION OF THE COMPLAINT; (2)      THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S COMMISSION'S ADOPTION OF THE
INITIAL FINDINGS RENDERED BY THE OFFICE; (3)      IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS; (4)      IMPOSITION OF REMEDIES; OR (5)      OTHER ACTION CONSISTENT WITH THIS TITLE. (F) (E) IN DETERMINING APPROPRIATE ACTION ON A DISCRIMINATION
CLAIM, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMISSION MAY TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ANY
EVIDENCE PROVIDED OR UNCOVERED IN THE COURSE OF THE INVESTIGATION
REGARDING: (1)      THE IMPACT OF THE DISCRIMINATION ON AFFECTED PARTIES; (2)      THE IMPACT OF ANY AUTHORIZED REMEDY ON THE STATE OR ANY
OTHER PARTY; (3)      ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE RESPONDENT BUSINESS ENTITY TO
REMEDY THE ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION; (4)      THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANY PRIOR ATTEMPTS BY THE
RESPONDENT BUSINESS ENTITY TO REMEDY THE DISCRIMINATION; (5)      WHETHER THE RESPONDENT BUSINESS ENTITY HAS PROCURED
GOODS OR SERVICES FROM OR OTHERWISE ENGAGED IN BUSINESS WITH PERSONS
OR ENTITIES OF THE SAME PROTECTED CLASS AS THE COMPLAINANT TO AN EXTENT
SUFFICIENT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE RESPONDENT BUSINESS ENTITY HAS NOT
DISCRIMINATED AGAINST SUCH PROTECTED CLASS IN THE OVERALL CONTEXT OF
ITS BUSINESS; (6)      THE NUMBER AND SCOPE OF PRIOR VIOLATIONS OF THIS POLICY BY
THE RESPONDENT BUSINESS ENTITY; AND (7)      ANY OTHER EVIDENCE DETERMINED TO BE RELEVANT BY THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMISSION. (G) (F) (1) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION,
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMISSION SHALL MAKE THE INITIAL FINDINGS AND
ISSUE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION WITHIN 120 CALENDAR DAYS
OF THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT. (2) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMISSION MAY; (I) EXTEND THE TIME LIMIT SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS
SUBSECTION FOR GOOD CAUSE OR IF THE PARTIES AGREE TO MEDIATE A
SETTLEMENT TO THE COMPLAINT; AND (II) IF MEDIATION IS UNSUCCESSFUL. REFER THE MATTER TO THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. - 1590 -


  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1590   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives