|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
|
MARVIN MANDEL, Governor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as unnecessary and misleading. To the extent
that these vehicles are subject to
registration, they are included in the
definition of "motorcycle" in §11-133 of this
article. On the other hand, certain types of
motor—assisted bicycles are — by recent
legislation - excluded from the definition of
"motorcycle" and defined as "bicycles"; these
are not subject to registration under this
section (cf., §§ 11-104 and 11-138 of this
article, as amended by Ch. 406, Acts of 1976).
13-917 13-916. SINGLE UNIT (TWO OR MORE AXLES): CLASS E
(TRUCK) VEHICLES - IN GENERAL.
(A) CLASSIFICATION.
WHEN REGISTERED WITH THE ADMINISTRATION, EVERY
SINGLE UNIT TRUCK WITH TWO OR MORE AXLES IS A CLASS E
(TRUCK) VEHICLE.
(B) ANNUAL FEE; GROSS WEIGHT LIMITATIONS.
EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS PART, FOR EACH
CLASS E (TRUCK) VEHICLE, THE ANNUAL REGISTRATION FEE IS
BASED ON THE SHIPPING WEIGHT OF ITS CHASSIS AND
BATTERY, AS CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER, WITH MAXIMUM
GROSS WEIGHT LIMITATIONS FOR THE VEHICLE, AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAXIMUM GROSS
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHT LIMIT
|
FEE
|
|
|
|
(IN POUNDS)
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
$ 30
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
45
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
70
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
130
|
|
|
|
32,000
|
180
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
235
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
280
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
335
|
|
|
|
73,280
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHASSIS AND
BATTERY WEIGHT
(IN POUNDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
OR LESS
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
TO 4,000
|
|
|
|
4,001
|
TO 5,000
|
|
|
|
5,001
|
TO 6,000
|
|
|
|
6,001
|
TO 7,500
|
|
|
|
7,501
|
TO 9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OVER 9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVISOR'S NOTE: This section is new language derived
without substantive change from Art. 66 1/2,
§3-806(a) — except for the last sentence of
present §3—806(a), which now appears as
§13-919 of this subtitle.
In subsection (a) of this section, the term
"truck", which is defined in §11-171 of this
article, is substituted for the present
reference "to "commercial motor vehicles". The
latter is, for purposes of the current
Maryland Vehicle Law, an obsolete concept that
is wholly unnecessary. Furthermore, as
presently defined in Art. 66 1/2, §1-110, the
term is misleading and erroneous for purposes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
