Volume 725, Page 557 View pdf image |
(557) Containing eleven Acres of Land to which said Writ the said Joseph Mayo did appear in his proper person and vouch to warranty thereof the aforesaid Nicholas Gassaway who likewise appeared in his own proper person and entered into the said Warranty and further vouched over to warrant the same premisses with the Appurtenances the aforesaid Thomas Gassaway who also appeared by James Tilghman the third Esquire his Attorney lawfully authorised and impowered thereto and entered into the said Warranty and further vouched over to warrant the same Lands and premisses with the appurtenances the Common Vouchee of the same Court who thereupon appeared and entered into the same Warranty and after imparlance made default and such further and other proceedings were thereupon had that the said William Steuart did by Judgment of the same Court recover his Seisin against the same Joseph Mayo of and in the Demanded Lands and premisses and the said Joseph Mayo did recover over in value against the same Nicholas Gassaway and the said Nicholas Gassaway did further recover over in Value against the said Thomas Gassaway who did further recover over in Value against the Common Vouchee whereby a Common Recovery of the aforesaid Lands and premisses with treble voucher hath been had and suffered Now this Indenture Witnesseth that for the Settling and declaring the Intent and Use of the said Recovery and for and in Consideration of the Sum of five Shillings Sterling Money of Great Britain to him the said William Steuart by the aforesaid Joseph Mayo in hand paid at or before the Sealing and Delivery of these presents the receipt whereof is hereby Acknowledged it is hereby covenanted granted agreed and declared by and between the said parties to these presents that the said common Recovery so as aforesaid or in any Other Manner had and Suffered and the Execution thereof from and immediately after the suffering the same or any other recovery or recoveries of the said Mentioned premisses or any part thereof was Meant and intended to be and enure and is hereby declared to be and enure and that the recoveror therein named and his heirs should and shall stand and be Seised of and in the recovered Lands and premisses and every part and parcell thereof to and for the only proper Use and behoof of the same Joseph Mayo his Heirs and Assigns forever and to or for no Other Use Intent or Purpose whatsoever In Witness whereof the Parties to these presents have hereunto interchangeably set their Hands and Affixed their Seals the Day and Year first above written Sealed and Delivered Nicho.s Gassaway (seal) in the presence of Tho.s Gassaway (seal) Ge.o Steuart Joseph Mayo (seal) William Steuart (seal) On the back of the aforegoing Deed was thus Endorsed to wit Received on the Day and year first within written of and from the within named Joseph Mayo the Sum of Five Shillings Sterling Money being the Consideration Money within Mentioned to be by him paid me Tho.s Gassaway Ge.o Steuart William Steuart On the twenty Second Day of May 1769 came before me the Subscriber one of his Lordships Justices of the provincial Court the within named Nicholas Gassaway Thomas Gassaway Joseph Mayo and William Steuart and Severally Acknowledged the within Instrument of writing to be their respective Act and Deed to and for the Uses Intents and Purposes within Mentioned and the Lands and premisses therein Specified to be the Right and Estate of the within named Joseph Mayo his heirs and Assigns forever according to the true intent and meaning of the same Deed Recorded the 22.d Day of May 1769 Ge.o Steuart Ex.d This Indenture made this nineteenth day of May seventeen hundred and sixty Nine Between John Rogers of Prince Georges County of the one part and Thomas Key of Saint Marys County of the other part Witnesseth that Whereas for the docking barring and extinguishing all Estates Tail and Reversions or remainders thereupon expectant or depending of and in the Lands and Appurtenances hereinafter mentioned the said John Rogers as Demandant did heretofore at the request Cost and Charge of the aforesaid Thomas Key prosecute and sue forth out of his Lordships high Court of Chancery his Lordships Writ of Entry sur disseisin en le post against him the said Thomas Key returnable and returned the provincial Court at Annapolis the third Tuesday of May instant whereby the said John Rogers did demand against him the said (Thomas) |
||||
Volume 725, Page 557 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.