|
24 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [June 22
title "Governor," to follow immediately after Section 59A thereof, to
provide for recognition and acceptance of benefits under the Federal
Highway Safety Act of 1966, to empower the Governor to perform
duties and exercise responsibilities under said Act and to accept
federal funds thereunder, to provide for acceptance of funds under
said Act by political subdivisions, and to designate duties and
responsibilities of State officers and agencies.
The President put the question: shall the bill pass notwithstanding
the objections of the Executive ?
The President announced the veto was sustained by roll call as fol-
lows:
Affirmative—None
Negative
Senators—
Mr. President, Anderson, Bailey, Bertier, Bertorelli, Bishop, Brubaker, Byron, Clark,
Connolly, Conroy, Curran, Dean, Dorf, Emanuel, Finney, Friedler, Gore; Hall, Hart,
Hodges, Hoyer, Hughes (G.), Hughes (H.), Lapides, Lee, Malkus, Manning, Mitchell,
McCourt, McGuirk, Nock, Pine, Schweinhaut, Smelser, Snyder ,Staszak, Staten, Steffey,
Steinberg, Stone, Welcome, Wineland. Total—43
May 4, 1967.
Honorable William S. James
President of the Senate
State House
Annapolis, Maryland
Dear Mr. President:
In accordance with Section 17 of Article II of the Maryland
Constitution, I have vetoed today Senate Bill 372 and am returning
it to you.
This bill would authorize the Department of Chesapeake Bay
Affairs to regulate the buying and selling of oysters and clams at
certain designated buying stations. I am informed by the Attorney
General that the bill is lacking in form and legal sufficiency. For the
reasons given in the attached copy of his opinion, which is to be
considered a part of this message, I am compelled to veto the measure.
Sincerely yours,
(s) Spiro T. Agnew,
Governor.
Letter from State Law Department on S. B. 372
April 18, 1967.
The Honorable Spiro T. Agnew
Governor of Maryland
State House
Annapolis, Maryland 21404
Dear Governor Agnew:
At your request, I have examined Senate Bill 372, in order to
determine whether this Bill meets minimum constitutional require-
ments as to form and legal sufficiency.
|
 |