Volume 557, Page 629 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
629
And likewise the Defend.t by William Hemsley his Attorney comes and defends the force and Injury when &c.a and demurs in law to the Plt declaracon and prayes Judgm.t Hemsley Defend.t Which Demurrer being Argued and allowed of to be good in Law by this Court Judgm.t is Awarded for a Non suit Therfore it is considered by this Court that the Defend.t John Hunter doe Recover from the plt Gerrardus Westels as Well the sume of Fifty poundes of Tobaccoe for a Non suit as allsoe the sume of One hundred seaventy and Eight poundes of Tobaccoe cost of suit Clk 78 Simon Wilmer Clk attr 100 178
Therfore it is considered by this Court that the Defend.t John Hunter doe Recover from the Plant Gerrardus Westels as well the sume of Fifty poundes of Tobaccoe for a Non suit as allsoe the sume of One hundred fifty and Eight poundes of Tobaccoe Cost of suit Clk 58 Simon Wilmer Clk attr 100 158
First there is a great variance betweene the Original Writt & declaracon for in the Writt command is given to the sheerif that he take John Wade & in the Decl Jn.o Wade alias dictus Jn.o Wade of Kent County which is soe great a variance that it cannot be helpen by the statute of Joofaile Bulstrodus Reports p.t y 1.t feb 184 Shurley and Harrises case Idem 216 in Saney and Whentons cases in B R Hughes grand abridgm.t title county & declr pr 11.th |
![]() | |||||||
![]() | ||||||||
![]() |
Volume 557, Page 629 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.