Volume 553, Page 48 View pdf image (33K) |
48 VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS, NOVEMBER SESSION, 1805.
On motion. ORDERED, That the bill for draining a branch called Old-town Branch, lying in [... ]
The report of the committee on the petitions of Solomon Jones, of Dorchester county, and Jacob Hellen, of
The report of the committee on the petition of John Newton, of Baltimore county, was read the second time
The report of the committee on the petition of Philip Key, of Saint-Mary's county, was read the second
A petition from sundry inhabitants of Harford county, praying a law may pass to prevent the building of
On motion, ORDERED, That the supplementary act to the act relating to negroes, and to repeal the acts of,
A petition from Thomas Poteet, of Harford county, praying a law may pass to ascertain the damages sus-
A petition from Benjamin Oden and John Hodges, of Thomas, praying that they may be authorised to sell
On motion, ORDERED, That Mr. Mercer and Mr. Stuart be added to the committee appointed on the petition Mr. Contee, from the committee, delivers to the speaker the following report:
THE committee to whom was referred the petition of John Smith Brookes, of Prince-George's county, " re-
RESOLVED, That all proceedings be stayed on a judgment obtained against John Smith Brookes, of Prince-
aid judgment, after the expiration of the said stay, for the recovery of such sum or sums of money as shall or
By order, J. GOLDER, clk.
The house, according to the order of the day, proceeded to the second reading of the bill, entitled, A fur-
On further progression in reading the said bill, the question was put, That the words " not capital" be in-
On motion, the question was then put, That the words " and except in petitions and trials for freedom" be AFFIRMATIVE.
Neale, Mercer, Parnham, Cottman, Contee, Sadler, Ayres, Selby, Plater, Higgins,. Chapman, Moffit, Shaaff, Bishop, Jump, Tomlinson, Scott, Holland, Jackson, Van-Horn, Blake, Montgomery, Yates, Cresap. 35. Merriken, Stuart, Bayly, NEGATIVE.
Hanson, Somervell, Spencer, Dickinson, Gleaves, Kuhn, Stephen, Carroll, So it was resolved in the affirmative.
On motion, the question was then put, That the further consideration of said bill be referred to the first day
Mr. Stephen, from the committee, delivers to the speaker a bill, entitled, An act to provide for the erection
On motion, the question was put, Will the house postpone the consideration of the bill to regulate and dis-
The house proceeded to the second reading of the said bill; on motion, the question was put, That the fol- |
||||
Volume 553, Page 48 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.