|
1
|
the constitution?
|
|
2
|
MR. WINTERS: Well, I suppose it could be
|
|
3
|
done either way. I would be afraid if it were left to
|
|
4
|
statute that there might be some tampering with it some-
|
|
5
|
time under pressure. I think it would be safer to have
|
|
6
|
it in the constitution.
|
|
7
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Winters, do you have any
|
|
8
|
fixed ideas as to whether or not the lawyers should out-
|
|
g
|
number the laymen on the commission or should it be an
|
|
10
|
equal number or does it really make any difference, as
|
|
11
|
long as you have a fair representation of both groups?
|
|
12
|
MR. WINTERS: Well, I think I would be in-
|
|
13
|
clined to say yes to all of those. I think that it
|
|
14
|
probably would not make much difference in the effect,
|
|
15
|
bat from a public relations standpoint, I think there is
|
|
16
|
strong reason for having the laymen at least equal to
|
|
17
|
the lawyers, and I would say
|
|
18
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Does that include the judge as
|
|
19
|
in the lawyer group?
|
|
20
|
MR. WINTERS: Well, no. You cannot have it
|
|
21
|
exactly, because it is desirable to have an odd number
|
