|
1
|
of where one individual judge tended to have that effect.
|
|
2
|
MR. MARTINEAU: Is this because he was a
|
|
3
|
judge or just a dominating person?
|
|
4
|
MR. WINTERS: No, it was just the individual.
|
|
S
|
MRS. BOTHE: Is there any way of really being
|
|
6
|
able to know that, unless you serve on one of these
|
|
7
|
commissions?
|
|
8
|
MR. WINTERS: Well, they are people, the
|
|
9
|
lawyers, the judges and the laymen are people. And this
|
|
10
|
group right here offers a variety of personalities, and
|
|
11
|
any other group of this number would have a different
|
|
12
|
variety of personalities. But I do not believe that the
|
|
13
|
stereotypes of judge, lawyers and laymen over a long
|
|
14
|
period of time, over a group of commissions ere not
|
|
15
|
basically sound and all ought to be in there, in approxi-
|
|
16
|
mately the proportions that most of the commissions now
|
|
17
|
have. I think it is right.
|
|
18
|
MRS. BOTHE: Is it necessary to specify in
|
|
19
|
the constitituon itself the makeup of the nominating
|
|
20
|
commission or would that more naturally be a question of
|
|
21
|
statute after the nominating commission was specified in
|
