|
82
|
1
|
There was some discussion downstairs about not
|
2
|
recommending the unicameral system because of strategic
|
3
|
problems; and this is where I am getting presumptuous.
|
4
|
If I view your role correctly, you are in effect making
|
5
|
recommendations to a prospective constitutional convention.
|
6
|
It would seem to me that you could very well, if you de-
|
7
|
cide that this is something you want to try, you could
|
8
|
make this recommendation strongly or include it as a pos-
|
9
|
sibility, leaving it up to the convention to do what you
|
10
|
know they are going to do, anyway, but that you start this
|
11
|
process of what Mr. Eney has called the process of educating
|
12
|
the people in the long run, and if the Commission were to
|
13
|
give its endorsement to something of this kind, it at
|
14
|
least makes it legitimate; where now it is nothing more
|
15
|
than the brainchild of obscure college professors and the
|
16
|
League of Women Voters.
|
17
|
One final thing, and this is an impression I
|
18
|
have from studying the constitutional efforts in quite a
|
19
|
number of states. Don't settle for less than you can get
|
20
|
from the people. In Alaska, for example, I think I'm
|
21
|
right on this, there was a good deal of sentiment, I
|