|
81
|
1
|
in it and would like some of the states to experiment with
|
2
|
it, if we wanted to have an impact upon legislature
|
3
|
structure, we ought to talk about what most state legis-
|
4
|
latures have, the bicameral pattern, and that is why it
|
5
|
finds its way into the footnote and does not reflect the
|
6
|
change in the A. M. L. philosophy on this.
|
7
|
The second thing is if this Commission should
|
8
|
adopt the unicameral legislature as a proposal or should
|
9
|
adopt the bicameral legislature as a proposal, I think if
|
10
|
it is going to make recommendations on the bicameral system,
|
11
|
it should definitely make some strong recommendations as
|
12
|
to the structure of that legislature.
|
13
|
In the model, we came out with a provision that
|
14
|
we couldn't see any point in the upper house being more
|
15
|
than about one-third the size of the lower house and we
|
16
|
felt that if you were going to set up legislative districts,
|
17
|
that the house districts couldn't in effect be put together
|
18
|
then to conform with the senatorial districts, and there
|
19
|
was no particular reason for tying these into twisting
|
20
|
units of government which would or would not make any
|
21
|
sense, as far as apportionment is concerned.
|