|
80
|
1
|
do we want to restrain them? Someone once counted twenty-
|
2
|
eight steps in the legislative process, I think, at the
|
3
|
Federal level, anyway, and suggested if the majority
|
4
|
wanted something, it had to control twenty-eight steps.
|
5
|
The minority, the block action, only had to control one
|
6
|
of these steps. This is a gross exaggeration, but I think
|
7
|
it points out the principle I'm trying to make here.
|
8
|
I guess, if I can skip to the presumptuous
|
9
|
advice and perhaps skip some of these other things that
|
10
|
I would have referred to; one thing relates to a point in
|
11
|
the most recent model state constitution that we brought
|
12
|
out. In the sixth edition, for the first time we call for
|
13
|
or make provisions for an alternative pattern for structur-
|
14
|
ing the legislature. We said in effect that we will pro-
|
15
|
vide an alternative provision for a bicameral legislature.
|
16
|
This is the first time the model has reflected
|
17
|
any interest in the bicameral pattern. This was done not
|
18
|
in terms of a shift in the A. M. L. traditional support for
|
19
|
the unicameral legislature, but a feeling on the part of
|
20
|
some of us that there wasn't a great deal of interest in
|
21
|
this institution and, despite the fact we still believed
|