|
1
|
long as this constitutional provision is in the law.
|
|
2
|
MR. BROOKS: I believe we found the practice
|
|
3
|
on March 10, 1966, before the Miscellaneous Provisions
|
|
4
|
Committee, Pages 113 to 114, could be to the contrary
|
|
5
|
with regard to the inviolability, in that, as inter-
|
|
6
|
preted previously, this Section 3 of Article 8,
|
|
7
|
inviolability of school funds, means that once the
|
|
8
|
money goes into the fund it has to be expended for the
|
|
9
|
purposes appropriated. On the other hand, we found
|
|
10
|
that --
|
|
11
|
MR. CASE: Who said that?
|
|
12
|
MR. BROOKS: This is Mr. Sartorius, and on
|
|
13
|
a prior occasion we reported conversations with Mr.
|
|
14
|
Perkins to our research staff.
|
|
15
|
MR. CASE: Well, that doesn't persuade me.
|
|
16
|
MR. BROOKS: We have evidence that the funds
|
|
17
|
revert back to the general fund of the State.
|
|
18
|
MR. CASE: Well, they do not revert back.
|
|
19
|
They never leave the general fund; that's the point.
|
|
20
|
MR. BROOKS: Well, let me quote then --
|
|
21
|
MR. CASE: Well, Mr. Brooks, I don't care
|
