|
1
|
the school fund in the State shall bo inviolate. Our
|
|
2
|
research indicates that there is no school fund, as
|
|
3
|
such, and that the provision is superfluous.
|
|
4
|
DR. SENSE11BAUGH: I notice it uses capital
|
|
5
|
letters, which indicates it must have been something
|
|
6
|
specific back in those days. I would hope that you
|
|
7
|
would retain this, but modify the terminology and
|
|
8
|
possibly say something like school funds or school aid
|
|
9
|
funds established by the State.
|
|
10
|
MRS. BOTHE: Do you think that would be
|
|
11
|
necessary if Section 52, or the equivalent section
|
|
12
|
there, is an actual procedural protection of the funds
|
|
13
|
rather than just a statement of purpose or intent?
|
|
14
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: I think this has a little
|
|
15
|
different slant. This is a protection that the fund
|
|
16
|
is only going to be used for education, that you can-
|
|
17
|
not transfer it to anything else. This is a little
|
|
18
|
different slant from this other thing we have been
|
|
19
|
talking about, and I would like to see that in there,
|
|
20
|
that funds established by law would be inviolate and
|
|
21
|
dedicated only for the purpose cf education. Otherwise
|
