|
1
|
it would revert.
|
|
2
|
I can foresee the possibility of interagency
|
|
3
|
play on funds, which could happen. We have been having
|
|
4
|
a little discussion with the Teachers Retirement Fund
|
|
5
|
and other departments.
|
|
6
|
MRS. BOTHE: Our interpretation of Section 3
|
|
7
|
of Article 8 v?ould be that that provision would not
|
|
8
|
prevent such things happening, that the only real valid
|
|
9
|
actual protection existing is through Section 52 of
|
|
10
|
Article 3, and that this is surplusage that sounds
|
|
11
|
good. We hesitate to take it out because so many
|
|
12
|
educators seeni to feel that it is psychologically or
|
|
13
|
sentimentally important, but we wondered if it had any
|
|
14
|
other --
|
|
15
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: I think, to me, it means
|
|
16
|
keeping it for education, the funds that are set up for
|
|
17
|
education, and not --
|
|
18
|
MR. HOFF: You regard it as a restriction
|
|
19
|
upon the school authorities, then.
|
|
20
|
DR. SENSENSAUGH; Yes.
|
|
21
|
MR. CASE: Any other questions?
|
