|
1
|
MR. CASE: There are things that could
|
|
2
|
broadly be said, I suppose, that would be for the
|
|
3
|
public schools that are not subject to this prohibi-
|
|
4
|
tion because of various attorney generals' rulings,
|
|
5
|
which we discussed last time; but I would think your
|
|
6
|
salary, for example, which is not a part of this could
|
|
V
|
be interpreted to be "for the public schools."
|
|
8
|
You are certainly speaking for the public
|
|
9
|
schools here this morning and you are being paid for
|
|
10
|
it. So, I'm wondering whether or not --
|
|
11
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: That angle has never been
|
|
12
|
pulled.
|
|
13
|
MR. CASE: I am wondering whether or not
|
|
14
|
you and these members of your department would have any
|
|
15
|
objection to a rewording of this section, if it could
|
|
16
|
be done, to accurately describe just what is being done
|
|
17
|
now and protect the procedure that we have now?
|
|
18
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: I believe, in reading
|
|
19
|
over Mr. Raver's statement, his printed statement, I
|
|
20
|
presure there was a lot said in addition to the state-
|
|
21
|
ment here and --
|
