|
12
|
1
|
such a check, it is best secured through other consti-
|
2
|
tutional provisions, not through a legislative check, as
|
3
|
such. If you want to have checks on expropriations, you
|
4
|
have these checks through the Governor's veto, by referen-
|
5
|
dum; but to have a check in the legislature just to have
|
6
|
a check in the legislature is not something defensible in
|
7
|
theory.
|
8
|
MR. HARVEY: On that last paragraph, on Page 5,
|
9
|
I think there is a misprint there, unicameralists instead
|
10
|
of bicameralists.
|
11
|
DR. MICHENER: Yes. A more serious attack is
|
12
|
made on what is now one of the prime defenses of bicameral-
|
15
|
ism. that it Rives an independent review of legislation.
|
14
|
The unicameralists assert first that this
|
15
|
factually is not true, that in a bicameral legislature,
|
16
|
as a matter of actual fact, legislation is introduced, it
|
17
|
piles up at the end of the session and it is passed
|
18
|
hastily, without any review; that one chamber will often
|
19
|
pass legislation on the assumption that the second chamber
|
20
|
will review it. Particularly with noncontroversial legis-
|
21
|
lation, it is true, according to unicameralists, the
|