|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1200 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 25,
The question recurring upon the adoption of the amend-
ment,
Mr. Robinson demanded the yeas and nays,
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
Messrs.
Dunbar, Turner, Snowden,
Robinson, Fitzjarrell, Dashiell—7.
Rullman,
NEGATIVE.
Messrs.
Mattingly, Purnell, Chaisty,
Usilton, Riggs, Harig,
Hodges, Vandiver, Sanders,
Baldwin, Culbreth, Farrow,
Whitelock, Goldsborough, Ranger,
Curtis, Rusk, Jones,
Given, Berkemeier, Griffith,
Lankford, Lewis, Rawlings,
Gunby, McWilliams, Sprigg,
Ford, Hoblitzell, Brown,
Ward, Stewart, Rinehart,
Cockey, McAleese, Lamotte,
Neal, Gill, Browning—39.
So the amendment submitted by Mr. Robinson was rejected.
Pending the call of the roll, in taking the vote upon the
above amendment submitted by Mr. Robinson,
Mr. Hinks declined to vete because he deemed the propo-
sition unworthy of consideration by this House.
Mr. Naill also declined to vote for the reasons advanced by
Mr. Hinks.
Mr. Rutledge declined to vote for the reason that the
amendment offered by the member from Anne Arundel is a
sneer and reflection on the majority of the House who voted
for the amendment of Mr. Hoblitzell.
Mr. Scott declined to vote because he considered the propo-
sition too trifling to receive any consideration from gentle-
men interested and earnestly engaged in advancing the best
interests of the entire people of the State.
Mr, Donaldson refuses to vote because this proposition is
belittling of the whole subject, and cannot be entertained
consistently with the self-respect of this House.
Mr. Clark declined to vote because he considered the propo-
sition unbecoming, undignified and ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
