clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the House, 1892
Volume 398, Page 744   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
744 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 10,
efficiency, the canal and navigation works hereby de-
mised, and also the canal and navigation works of the
Tide-Water Canal Company; and from time to time,
and at all times, indemnify and save harmless the
party of the first part from all liabilities, damages,
claims and suits by reason of anything done or
omitted in the premises by the party of the second
part."
I am assured that the lessee has kept this covenant;
that it has maintained the Susquehanna Canal in pub-
lic use and in good order and condition, and is pre-
pared to transport over it all the freight which may
be offered to it for that purpose.
Unfortunately, however, the Pennsylvania Railroad
Company has withdrawn from the Susquehanna
Canal all the coal tonnage which that company for-
merly sent south over the Susquehanna Canal, and
which for a number of years constituted its chief
business.
This coal tonnage, instead of being transported over
the canal, is now loaded at Columbia into cars and
sent to its destination by rail.
Under these circumstances, I do not see that any
steps can be taken to compel by law the exemption of
transportation upon the canal. But I shall give the
matter furter consideration and do whatever I law-
fully and properly can to bring about such a desirable
result.
Yery respectfully,
JOHN P. POE,
Attorney General.
Which was read, and ordered spread on the
Journal.
Mr. Gaver presented a petition from Geo. P. Rien-
hart, and 47 other citizens of the town of Walkers-
vile, in Frederick county, praying for the passage of
an Act to incorporate said town.
Which was read, and referred to the Frederick
County Delegation.
Mr. Leonard presented a petition from J. W. Trout
and 52 other citizens of Talbot county, against the re-
peal of the local option law and against high license.
Which was read, and referred to the Talbot County
Delegation.


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the House, 1892
Volume 398, Page 744   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives