|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1892.] OF THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES. 183
The question then recurred upon the motion to in-
definitely postpone.
Mr. Fiells moved as a substitute for the motion to
indefinitely postpone, "that further consideration of
said bill be postponed, and bill be made the order of
the day for Tuesday, February 9th, at 12.30 P. M."
Upon which motion Mr. Anderson moved the pre-
vious question.
The question being, shall the main question be now
put ?
Mr. Carter demanded the yeas and nays.
The demand was sustained.
The yeas and nays were called and appeared as
follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.—Messrs. Speaker, Combs, Garner,
Wilson. Donaldson, Hutchins, Sappington, of Anne
Arundel, Carrico, Orrick. Cole, Elliott, Hamilion, Jr.,
Schlaffer, Collins, Wooters, Leonard, Anderson, Ster-
ling, Meredith, Smith, of Dorchester, Miles, Beeks,
Grove, of Cecil, Bowie, of Prince George's, Wallen,
Godwin, Franklin, Hayman, McSherry, Gaver, Sap-
pington, of Frederick, Bevard, Hayward, Deen, John-
son, Thompson, Brennan, Carter, Field, Bowie, of
Balto, city, O'Conor, Gill, Carr, Cornthwaite, Joyce,
Smith, of Washington, Fockler, Garrott, Laird,
Griffith, Barber, Young, Hosken, Sr., Stottlemyer,
Haines, Berret, Leeds, Tracey, Haslup, Bittinger—60.
NEGATIVE.— Messrs. Brashears, Monmonier, Hill,
Perrie, Fitzgerald, Fox, Gallagher, Sams, Moore—9.
So the previous question was ordered.
The question then recurred on the original motion to
indefinitely postpone.
Mr. Miles demanded the yeas and nays,
The demand was sustained.
The yeas and nays were called and appeared a
follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.—Messrs. Hutchins, Orrick, Cole,
Elliott, Hamilton, Jr.. Schlaffer, Collins, Wooters,
Leonard, Anderson, Sterling, Meredith Smith, of
Dorchester, Miles, Grove, of Cecil, Wallen, Godwin,
Franklin, Hayman, Deen, Johnson, Brennan, O'Conor,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
