|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1892.] OF THE,HOUSE OF DELEGATES. 1031
The yeas and navs were called and appeared as fol-
lows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Speaker, Donaldson, Hutch-
ins, Sappington, of Anne Arundel, Bowie, of Prince
George's, Perrie, Thompson, Fuld, Walz, Fitzgerald,
Brennan, Fox, Carter, Bowie, of Baltimore city,
O'Conor, Gill, Frincke, Joyce, Young, Leeds—20.
NEGATIVE. — Messrs. Strong, Brashears, Ireland,
Maddox, Orrick, Cole, Elliott, Hamilton, Jr., Col-
lins, Anderson, Meredith, Miles, Kirk, Beeks, Grove,
of Cecil, Bryan, Godwin, Franklin, Wilkinson, Grove,
of Frederick, Bevard, Hayward, Stearns, Deen,
Johnson, Field, Gallagher, Sams, Carr, Cornthwaite,
Shafer, Laird, Griffith, Canby, Barber, Hosken, Sr.,
Stottlemyer, Haines, Sellman, Berret, Tracey, Haslup,
Ellegood, Laws, Bittinger, Michaels—46.
So the motion to refer was rejected.
Said bill, together with proposed amendments,
On motion of Mr. Carter,
Was made the Order of the Day for Thursday,
March 24th, at 1 P. M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORDER OF THE DAY.
The House, at 1 30 P. M , considered the Order of the
Day, being
The motion to substitue House bill (125) known as
the Telephone Bill, for the unfavorable report of Com-
mittee on Corporations of March 18th.
Mr. Joyce made the point of order, that the bill was
in the hands of the State Printer and not in the pos-
session of the House, and no motion affecting the bill
could be entertained.
The Speaker ruled the point well taken.
Mr. Carter appealed from the decision of the Chair.
The question being,
"Shall the decision of the Chair stand as the judg-
ment of the House ?"
It was decided in the affirmative.
The Secretary of the Senate appeared and delivered
the following message:
House bill entitled an Act to repeal and re-enact
with amendments new section 181, Article 33, of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
