678 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 2,

Henkle, Lee, Groh,

Robinson, Dawson, Wack,

Lancaster, Williams, Park,

Seth, McCosker, Brace,

Coulbourn, T. H. Hamilton, Waters,

Gordy, G. R. Hamilton, Galt,

Turner, of Cecil, McWilliams, Maclin,

Etchison, Staylor, Stewart, of How'd,

Latehford, Stewart, of B. city, Bedsworth—39.

So the motion to recommit did not prevail.

The question then recurring upon the adoption of the
amendment proposed by Mr, Vanderford,

Mr. Groh demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand being sustained,

The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows :

AFFIRMATIVE.
Messrs.

Duer, Annan, Watkins,
Thompson, Dawson Fletchall,
Kemp. Williams, Vanderford—11.
Pruitt, Clark

NEGATIVE.

Messrs.

Hines, Speaker, Etchison, Gill,

Bond, Latchford, Hart,

Colton, Robey, Loane,

Merritt, Miller, McColgan,

Henkle, Lamar, Joyce,

Robinson, Grafton, Groh,

Lancaster, Lee, Wack,

Hawkins, McCosker, Park,

Matthews, T. H. Hamilton, Brace,

Turner, of B. co.,C. R. Hamilton, Galt,

Seth, McWilliams, Maclin,

Coulbourn, Staylor, Stewart, of How'd,

Gordy, Stewart, of B. city, Bedsworth—39.

So the amendment proposed by Mr. Vanderford was re-
jected.

Said bill was then read a second time, and ordered to be
engrossed for a third reading.

The bill entitled an Act to pay P. T. Hamilton the sum of
forty-nine dollars,

Being upon a second reading,

Mr. Seth submitted the following amendment: