clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 541   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

TWIGG VS. JACOBS. 541
JAMES TWIGG
vs. LAND OFFICE, 16TH OF SEPTEMBER, 1847.
GABRIEL JACOBS.
[WARRANTS OF RESURVEY.]
THE right to a warrant of resurvey, only appertains to a party who has a fee
simple interest in the original tract purpose to be resurveyed, and by part-
ing with the title to such tract subsequent to the date of the warrant, the
latter loses its effect as a warrant of resurvey.
A warrant of resurvey may operate as a common warrant, and affect any va-
cant land which a common warrant could affect.
The state will never knowingly grant the same land a second time.
[In this case, a warrant of resurvey upon a tract of land
called Fat Bacon was issued on the 9th of September, 1776.
To the certificate of the surveyor, returned on the 1st of No-
vember, 1797, a caveat was filed by James Twigg on the 5th
of April, 1847, for the reasons appearing from the following
opinion of the Chancellor.]
THE CHANCELLOR:
It appears, in this case, that Gabriel Jacobs, by whom the
warrant of resurvey was taken out on the 9th of September,
1796, subsequently, that is, on the 27th of October, 1819, sold
and conveyed the original tract, called "Fat Bacon," to one
Lenox Martin, from whom, by sundry mesne conveyances the
title in said original tract has devolved upon the caveator,
James Twigg. This transfer of the title to the original tract,
would, it is supposed, take from the warrant the character and
effect of a warrant of resurvey, as the right to such a warrant
only appertains to him who has a fee simple interest in the
original tract proposed to be resurveyed, and I am of opinion,
that by parting with the title in the original, subsequent to the
date of the warrant, the latter loses its effect as a warrant of
resurvey. But the general court decided, in Hammond vs.
Norris, 2 Har. & Johns., 141, that a warrant of resurvey may
operate as a common warrant, and affect any vacant land

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 541   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives