92 BOARMAN'S CASE.—2 BLAND.

that the order of the 11th of April last might be rescinded,
&c.

BLAND, C., 28th June, 1826.—Ordered that the matter of the
said petition be taken up, considered and decided dpon and the
order of the 11th of April last, be rescinded, on the 26th day of
July next, unless good cause to the contrary be then shewn: pro-
vided, that a copy of this order, together with a copy of the said
petition, be served on the said James Boarinau on or before the
12th day of July next. And it is further ordered, that the order
of the 11th of April last be and the same is hereby suspended
until further order.

James Boarnian put in his answer, on oath, in which he again
urged, that the trustee Ignatius Manning, was a non-resident,
without denying, that the fact had been made known to the Chan-
cellor when the appointment was made, as was alleged; that this
respondent's character was good; that the trustee Ignatms Man-
ning had neglected his duty, &c. Whereupon this respondent
prayed, that the order of the 28th of June last, might be revoked;
that the trustee Ignatius Manning might be ordered to render an
account, &c.

After which, James Boarnian, by his petition, stated, that the
lunatic Cornelius Boarrnan was dead; and that he had obtained
letters of administration upon his estate. Whereupon he prayed,
that the trustee Ignatius Maiming might be ordered to render a
full account; and that the petitioner might have such other relief
as was suited to the nature of his case.

BLAND, C.. 6th February, 1820.—Ordered, that the said Igna-
tins Manning render a full and true account on oath, of all his
proceedings as trustee of the late Cornelius Boarman, as prayed,
ou the 12th day of March next, or show good cause to the contrary:
provided, that a copy of this order, together with a copy of the
said petition, be served on the said Manning on or before the sec-
ond day of March next.

This order not having been served in time, it was, on motion re-
newed, the time of service enlarged, and the first of June then next
appointed as the day to show cause.

* The trustee Ignatius Manning put in his answer on oath,
97 as required, in which he stated, that he had delivered over
to the administrator of the late lunatic, all his personal estate, ex-
cept the one-third part of the sum of £353 7s. 0d. which would be
deducted from the proportionate part of the said lunatic's estate,
<lue to this respondent as one of his heirs, &c.