CAMPBELL'S CASE.—2 BLAND. 205

hereby committed to James Cunningham, of Frederick
* County: Provided, that before he acts as such committee 218
he shall file with the register a bond to the State, executed by
himself and a surety or sureties to be approved by the Chancellor,
in the. penalty of two thousand dollars conditioned for the faithful
performance of the trust reposed in him by this or any future
order in the premises; and to account for and deliver up the estate
and property of the said Charles Campbell when lawfully re-
quired.

The committee appointed by this order accepted the trust
and soon after gave bond accordingly, which was liled and ap-
proved. (h)

The trustee Donaldson reported, that he had sold a square in the
City of Washington for the sum of $3,000. one-fourth of the purchase
money to be paid in cash, and the residue in one, two and three years:
which sale was finally ratified on the 4th of September, 1828. And
he further reported, that he had contracted to mortgage a part
of the estate of the testator, upon the terms specified in the
deed then exhibited, which he submitted for the confirmation of
the Chancellor.

BLAND, C.. 15th June, 1830.—Ordered, that the proposed terms
as specified in the deed exhibited by the trustee be approved, and
That he execute a mortgage accordingly.

On the 14th of February, 1829, Richard Harwood of Thomas,
and Henry H. Harwood, administrators of Benjamin Harwood de-
ceased, for themselves and in behalf of the other creditors of the
late Willaini Campbell, tiled their bill in this Court against Edward
Campbell, John McHenry, James Cunningham and Catherine his
wife, William C. Cunningliam, James Cunningham. Junr., Rebec-
ca Cunninghani, Charles E. Cunningliam, George Cunninghani.
Charles Campbell and John I. Donaldsou.

This bill after setting forth, in substance, all the circumstances
as hereinbefore detailed, states, that the late William Campbell
was, at the time of his death, indebted to the amount stated to
the intestate of the plaintiffs, which debt yet remains unsatisfied;
that the trustees and executors, these defendants Edward Camp-
bell and John McHenry, made sale of large portions of the estate
of * their testator; the proceeds of which they have not ap-
plied in satisfaction of his debts; that the trustee, the 219

(h) This proceeding is not introduced here, because of its properly form-
ing any part of this case; but because it has been referred to as an exhibit,
and because it is intimately connected with this case; and may be useful in
other respects.