clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Page 203   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

HANNAH K. CHASE'S CASE.—1 BLAND. 205

be hereafter determined on a consideration of his trouble, skill, and
diligence in the premises. And it is further ordered, that on the
fifth day of May next, a proper and suitable person will be appointed
a receiver under this order; provided, that on or before that day
the parties may nominate and recommend for the appointment to
the Chancellor, such person or persons as they or either of them
may think proper.

Two of the defendants. Matilda Ridgely and Ann Chase, on the
4th of May, 1826, filed their petition, objecting to the appointment
of a receiver, which petition was then submitted to the Chan-
cellor: but a decision upon it was postponed until a nomination
of a receiver should be made. After which, on the 10th May,
1826, a nomination was made, and the case was again submitted to
the Chancellor.

BLAND, C., 9th June, 1826.—Ordered, that the petition of Ma-
tilda Ridgely and Ann Chase, be dismissed with costs; and that
Peter H. Cruse, of the City of Baltimore, be and he is hereby
appointed a receiver under and according to the order of the 26th
of April last.

After a receiver had been thus appointed and he had taken the
property under his care, the case was prepared and brought on for
a final hearing.

BLAND, C., 28th April, 1827.—This case standing ready for
hearing, the solicitors of both parties were fully heard, and the
proceedings read and considered.

It appears from the bill as amended, and the plaintiff's exhibits,
that the late Samuel Chase, alter and during his marriage with
the plaintiff, became seized in fee simple of a certain real estate,
situated within the City of Baltimore, called the Fountain Inn;
which property, on the 26th day oi February. 1800, he leased to
James Bryden for the term of fifteen years, reserving an annual
rent of 2,000 dollars. The plaintiff, on a privy examination,
acknowledged the validity of this lease, and made a relinquish-
ment of her dower in the usual form. Samuel Chase, the husband
of the plaintiff, died on the 19th April, 1811. The lease to Bryden
expired on the 26th February. 1821. Those who claimed under
*the late Samuel Chase leased this property to Basil Wil-
liamson, who had the possession thereof when this bill was 216
filed. The plaintiff claims one-third of this property as her dower;
and she also claims a remuneration for the rents and profits of her
third part from the death of her husband; and thereupon prays,
that dower may be assigned to her; that the property may be sold
for the payment of the rents and profits due to her; or that the

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Page 203   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives