Volume 191, Page 71 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
( 71 ) March 11th. 1690/1 Then this following accompt was produced. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. John. Poplewell. Dbtr. tobb. Ano. Domi. 1681 Decemr. 16:// itt. to one potle of Cyder & Suger and one Cake. ----- 017 itt. to 3:gall of Ale. - - - - - - - - - - - - - 096 itt to 3:quarts of drams burnd. - - - - - - - - - 075 17th itt to 3 gall of Ale & one potle of Cyder & suger. - - 110 itt to 2: Bowls of Punch - - - - - - - - - - - 200 itt to 1: gall of Ale & Suger. - - - - - - - - - - 036 itt to 2: one pint of Brandy & Suger. - - - - - - - 012 18th. itt to 1: gall of Ale & suger . - - - - - - - - - - 036 itt to 5: gall of Ale. one pint of Brandy burnt. - - - - 210 ffebry 16th itt to 2: one pint of drams & Suger One pint of Sack. 037 itt to 2: mackrells & five bunns & one potle of Ale.- - 041 itt to 2. one pint of drams & Suger. - - - - - - - 012 17th itt to 5: potles of Ale. one Mackrell one bunn - - - - 093 itt to 1: potle of Cyder & Suger. - - - - - - - - - 014 itt to 1: pint & halfe of drams burnt. - - - - - - - 036 18th itt to 8:gall one quart of Ale. - - - - - - - - - - 264 itt to 2: potles of Cyder & Suger 1: pint brandy burnt 058 March 16th itt to 1:botle of brankett & one gall . Cyder & Suger - - 040 82 itt to 1: quart of Punch . - - - - - - - - - - - 025 Errors Excepted per me. 1412. Thomas: Midleton. Thomas: Midleton the Subscriber of the above account made Oath in Open Court of Accomack County Septembr Court 8th 1686. that the same was a just and true accot and that he never recd any Satisfaction for the same. Test. John: Washbourne. Clk Cur Comt Accom. - - - - - - The whole proceedings being read and viewed, being Solely left to the judgmt of this Court (who having perused the papers) doe unamously conclude that Arthur Robbins never signed that paper bearing date the 20th. of ffebry 1681, and given under his hand the 4th day of 7ber 1690. - therefore the Court not taking it to be the handwriting of sd Robins. doe Order a Non Suit agt the plt. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - James: Barry Plt Somerset County Ssc. Maryland. John:Rowell of this County was attached to answer unto agt James: Barry in an action of the Case. whereupon the aforesd James Barry by his Attorney John:Rowell.Deft Edward: Jones saith that the said John:Rowell in the year 1687. and in 88. and the year - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1689. then the said John:became indebted unto the said James fourty nine good Slaughter as doth appear by account, and here in Court produced, which said fourty nine hides the sd John: did promise and assume to pay to the said James in year 1688 but the sd John |
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 191, Page 71 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.