Volume 190, Page 194 View pdf image (33K) |
194 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Jan, 29, The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows :
So, the amendment was rejected. The bill was then read a second time, and ordered to be engrossed for a third reading. On motion of Mr. Chaisty, (the rules being suspended), The House proceeded to the consideration of the bill, en- titled an Act entitled a supplement to an Act, entitled an Act to lay off streets in Baltimore county, adjoining Balti- more City, and to repeal certain Acts inconsistent there- with, passed by the General Assembly of Maryland at the January Session, 1870, chapter 99. Said Blll having been made the order of the day for Thurs- day next, 1st February, On motion of Mr. Chaisty, The vote by which the bill had been made the order of the day for Thursday next was reconsidered. The bill was then placed upon file for a second reading. The bill, entitled an Act to repeal the Act of 1870, chap- ter 418, entitled an Act to repeal all those sections of Article |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume 190, Page 194 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.