| Volume 190, Page 1046 View pdf image (33K) |
|
1946 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 22, The question recurring upon the adoption of the unfavor- able report, Mr. McCosker moved that the bill be substituted for the unfavorable report of the Committee. The question then recurring upon concurring in the mo- tion submitted by Mr. McCosker, Mr. McCosker demanded the yeas and nays. The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as fol- lows : AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Duvall, Hamilton, T. H., Stewart, Henkle, Cooper, dark, of B. city, Banks, Hamilton, C. R., McColgan, Saucer, Foster, Markland, McCosker, Staylor, Griswold—13. . NEGATIVE. Messrs Gorman, Speaker, Vickers, Chaisty, Dunbar, Radcliffe, Harig, 'Winner, Groome, Young, of Wash. i Hurtt, Mearns, Newcomer, Wells, Penington, Whitson, Bond,' Scott, Hilton, Sparrow, Ford, of Q. A., Clark,of Mont. > Chapman, Franklin, Porter, Stone, Phillips, Coles, Shipley. Rowe, Young, of Alle., Foard, of B co., Delaplane, Robinette, Litzinger,, Miller, Steele, Spencer, Routzahn, Lamotte, L. A. J, Butler, Baldwin, Polk, Goldsborough, Streett, Lamotte, H. H. Waller, Hardcastle, Linthicum, Dougherty, Deweese, Johnson, Smith. Colton, of B. city, Langrell—54. So the motion to substitute the bill for the unfavorable report of the Committee, Was not sustained. The question then recurring upon the adoption of the un- favorable report of the Committee, It was adopted. Mr. Ford, of Queen Anne's, submitted the following message: |
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 190, Page 1046 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.