| Volume 142, Page 426 View pdf image (33K) |
|
420 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Feb. 18, The question recurring upon the adoption of the order, Strike out all after the word " ontinuance " to the word Which was read. Mr. Smith, of Baltimore city. moved to lay the amendment The question being on concurring in the motion, Mr. McElroy demanded the yeas and nays. The demand being sustained. The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows :
So the motion to lay the amendment on the table, did not The amendment way then rejected. The question then recurring upon the adoption of the order, Mr. Legg moved that the order be indefinitely postponed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Volume 142, Page 426 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.