| Volume 107, Page 173 View pdf image (33K) |
|
1866.] OF THE SENATE. 173 To the President' of the Senate of MaryIand: Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of a letter, of which the endorsed is a copy, purporting to come from a Committee of the Seriate. I cannot admit the right of a.Commttee of the Senate to inquire of the Judges of the Courts, the reasons for their judgments in cases, which are or have been depending before them. Of the three cases concurring, of which inquiry is made in this letter, two have been argued and submitted to the judg- ment of the Court; but not decided, while the other is await- ig the return of witnesses whose testimony is deemed ma- terial by the petitioners. It is not the privilege of the Senate, I submit, to know the opinion of the Court in. these cases before the parties to the cause andl the counsel who argued them, know it. The Criminal Court of Baltimore has issued, and will con- tinue to issue writs of habes corpus in every case where a party alleges illegal confinement, and states the facts requir- ed by the Code in his petition. The writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right. It is the cheap and swifti process of the law, which, guarantees the lib- erty of the citizen. It, is imperative upon every judge by the Iaw of Maryland, to issue it immediately upon application, and I am not aware that the Court of Appeals ever made any decision to the contrary, as your Committee seem to suppose. The only way to determine the propriety or impropriety of its issue, is upon. hearing, and to have such hearing the parties must be brought before the Court, at, however, "great expense or inconvenience." If the member;; of the Senate desire to know the judgment of the Criminal Court of Baltimore in any case heretofore de- termine by that Court, I. .suggest an application to the Clerk of the Court for a record of proceedings in such case. I am not aware that the judgment of this Court, in any case tried before it, has been reversed in appeal by the Court of Appeals, on the contrary the judgments of this Court have always been affirmed. If it should, happen to the contrary, hereafter, in answer to the very indelicate interrogatory of this Committee. I answer I should submit to the better judgment of that Court, with that obedience, its appellate character requires, and with the |
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 107, Page 173 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.