Volume 107, Page 1450 View pdf image (33K) |
70 In the matter of the petition of Thomas A Spence, contest- ing the election of John R. Franklin, as Circuit Judge of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit of Maryland: At the examination of the witnesses produced on the part of the Claimant, the Contestant objects to the question, "for whom would you have voted had you been permitted to vote5'" addressed to many of the witnesses, and also to the answers thereto, and it was agreed by the Contestant and the attor- nies of the Claimant, that although the objection does not appear in the depositions of the witnesses answering the questions, yet that the objection should be considered as made in every case where the question, was propounded and answer given thereto. EDWARD F. DUER, J. P. January 12, 1866. In the matter of the petition of Thomas A. Spence, con- testing the election of John R. Franklin, as Circuit Judge of the Twelfth Judicial.Circuit of Maryland: The Contestant insists that the decisions of the officers of Registration in the several election districts of Somerset county, entered in their hooks of Registration, as to tho qua- lification or disqualification of all persons appearing before them for Registration are final and conclusive, and objects to any and all evidence of inquiry into or impeachment of the propriety or correctness of such decisions. At the examination of the Witnesses for the Claimant it was agreed by the Contestant and the Attornies for the Claimant, that the aforegoing objection should be considered as made to the testimony and deposition of each and every witness inquiring into or tending to impeach the propriety or correctness of such decisions of the Registers. EDWARD F. DUER, J, P. January 12, 1866. |
||||
Volume 107, Page 1450 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.