clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1796
Volume 105, Page 34   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
34            VOTES and PROCEEDINGS, November, 1796.

    The clerk of the house of delegates delivers to the clerk of the senate the following message, with
the resolution therein mentioned.

By the HOUSE of DELEGATES, December 19, 1796.
        GENTLEMEN OF THE SENATE,
    WE have returned you the resolution in favour of Daniel Bussard, of Frederick county, to which
you refused your assent, but hope, upon reconsideration, the obvious propriety of the resolution will
procure your concurrence in the measure.  Every principle of equity certainly dictates the propriety
of costs being recoverable from the state in cases where our citizens have been manifestly harrassed by
process issued at the instance and for the recovery of a debt supposed to be due the state.  We do not
know what principle actuated the senate in refusing assent to the resolution, but suppose the general
rule of law which has been adopted, that the state is not liable for costs, was the ruling motive;
but if, on reconsideration, this rule should appear unjust and hard, we anxiously hope it will be departed
from.
                                                                By order,                            W.  HARWOOD, clk.
Which was read.
    The resolution in favour of John Smith Brookes was read the second time and dissented from.
    The resolution in favour of Gassaway Watkins was read the second time and assented to.
    The bill, entitled, A supplement to the act, entitled, An act to improve and repair the streets in
Frederick-town, in Frederick county, and for other purposes therein mentioned, was read the second
time and will pass.
    The bill, entitled, An act to empower the justices of the levy court of Charles county to assess
and levy annually a sum of money for the purpose therein mentioned, was read the second time and
will pass.
    The resolution in favour of Basil Williams was read the second time and dissented from.
    The following message was prepared, read and agreed to.
By the SENATE, December 19, 1796.
        GENTLEMEN,
    WE have rejected the resolution in favour of Basil Williams.  By examining the proper officers,
we think it will be more proper to take up the consideration of this subject at the next session of
assembly.  We are informed that a suit is now depending upon a bond of Clement Sewall, and
others, assigned the state by Basil Williams.  If the sum mentioned in the bond is not recovered, it
would be nugatory to pass the credit proposed, as a large sum would remain due the state from Patrick
Hamilton.  We find that the securities are not liable to put into any inconvenience before the 
next session of assembly, and that probably they could not give the security required, which at present
would appear necessary, because if the account liquidated against Christie's estate should have been
assigned by Patrick Hamilton, the assignee would, upon application, receive the amount from our 
treasury, notwithstanding the credit proposed being passed.  All these difficulties may probably cease
by the next session of assembly.
                                                                By order,                            A.  VAN-HORN, clk.
    The resolution in favour of Vachel Stevens was read the second time and assented to.
    On motioned, ORDERED, That the times of sitting by the senate during the remainder of this
session be from nine o'clock in the morning till two in the evening, and from five in the evening
until eight.
The senate adjourns until to-morrow morning 9 o'clock.

T    U    E    S    D    A    Y,    December 20, 1796.

    THE senate met.  Present the same members as on yesterday.  The proceedings of yesterday
were read.
    The resolution in favour of John Smith Brookes, the resolution in favour of Gassaway Watkins,
the bill, entitled, A supplement to the act, entitled, An act to improve and repair the streets in
Frederick-town, in Frederick county, and for other purposes therein mentioned, the bill, entitled, 
An act to empower the justices of the levy court of Charles county to assess and levy annually a
sum of money for the purpose therein mentioned, the resolution in favour of Basil Williams, with
the message respecting the said resolution, and the resolution in favour of Vachel Stevens, were sent
to the house of delegates by the clerk.
    The following message was prepared, read and agreed to.

By the SENATE, December 20, 1796.
        GENTLEMEN,
    WE have received your message of thus day upon the subject of a reconsideration of the resolve
in favour of Daniel Bussard, and cannot reconsider as requested.  We are not sensible of the propriety
of distinguishing any individual applicant from all other persons in the same situation.  The 
law against which relief is prayed for has for a long time existed, and many have been subject to its
operation.  the recency of the fact may interest the passions, but ought not to influence the judgement.
The propriety of justice of the law upon the subject as now existing, is certainly a distinct
consideration.  Whatever may be the proper idea as to future costs, it appears to us that policy, and
a due respect to former legislatures, ought to prevent us from passing laws similar to that requested.
If the principle of a retrospect of this kind is once admitted, precedent is established, which we
conceive may lead to the most serious and alarming consequences.
                                                                By order,                            A.  VAN-HORN, clk.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1796
Volume 105, Page 34   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives