|
|
13,815
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
feel that even though there may be no problems with the
|
|
2
|
language as it now exists that we can insure ourselves
|
|
3
|
by not getting into questions of when a statute was passed,
|
|
4
|
ub simply to say that we intend to keep this section exactly
|
|
5
|
as it was in the prior Constitution, and that we pick up
|
|
6
|
all the possibilities, so to speak, except to the extent
|
|
7
|
that the Federal Constitution will not allow us to do so,
|
|
8
|
particularly in view of the fact that the B&O Railroad has
|
|
9
|
already won one case involving the preservation of this
|
|
10
|
exemption on the basis that an attempt by the General
|
|
11
|
Assembly or by the Constitution to impair its prior rights
|
|
12
|
relating to the taxation exemption was a violation of the
|
|
13
|
contract clause of the Federal Constitution.
|
|
14
|
I think that we have at last arrived at the
|
|
15
|
point where we have carried over the intent and meaning
|
|
16
|
and impact of the prior section, that is Article 3, Section
|
|
17
|
48 of the old Constitution, and kept it as much intact as
|
|
18
|
possible, without on the face of the language violating the
|
|
19
|
Federal Constitution.
|
|
20
|
Hopefully, therefore, I would urge the adoption.
|
|
21
|
I am sorry that this has been so involved, but Delegate
|