|
|
13,816
|
|
1
|
Chabot did raise the point the other evening as did
|
|
2
|
Delegate Gleason and I think hopefully that this takes
|
|
3
|
care of it.
|
|
4
|
THE PRESIDENT: Is there any discussion?
|
|
5
|
Delegate Scanlan.
|
|
6
|
DELEGATE SCANLAN: Could I ask Delegate Gallagher
|
|
7
|
a question about his amendment to the abominable clause?
|
|
8
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Gallagher, do you yield?
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: Yes.
|
|
10
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Scanlan.
|
|
11
|
DELEGATE SCANLAN: If the State acting under
|
|
12
|
this clause does something that offends Article 1, Section
|
|
13
|
10, impairment obligation contract clause of the Federal
|
|
14
|
Constitution it would be unconstitutional. If it doesn't
|
|
15
|
act unconstitutionally, it wouldn't be constitutional. Why
|
|
16
|
do we have to put this nonsense in here?
|
|
17
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Gallagher.
|
|
18
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: I appreciate the statement
|
|
19
|
of the obvious. It has never been so patently put, I might
|
|
20
|
say to the delegate.
|
|
21
|
The answer is this, that we are forewarning the
|