|
|
10,967
|
|
1
|
DELEGATE CASE: Delegate Scanlan, I can't
|
|
2
|
agree with Delegate Rybcznski's statement that section
|
|
3
|
48 of article 3 is exactly the same in substance with
|
|
4
|
the proposed section 3.17ab. And I think in this there may
|
|
5
|
lie the flaw in your amendment.
|
|
6
|
Section 48 in the present Constitution contains
|
|
7
|
an exception for laws dealing with municipal corporations.
|
|
8
|
That was taken out by the committee's recommendation. If
|
|
9
|
we vote to keep old section 48 in the new Constitution,
|
|
10
|
will it not fly in the teeth of the Local Government
|
|
11
|
provisions which we have already passed?
|
|
12
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Scanlan.
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE SCANLAN: I must confess on that point
|
|
14
|
that Mr. Case is right. I had forgotten that we had
|
|
15
|
eliminated the municipal corporation provision that was
|
|
16
|
formerly found in article 48, and that matter would have to
|
|
17
|
be handled somewhere else if my amendment were adopted.
|
|
18
|
My amendment is not directed at that particular
|
|
19
|
problem, and I think it could be rectified by other language,
|
|
20
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Chabot.
|
|
21
|
DELEGATE CHABOT: Delegate Case asked my question,
|