|
|
10,966
|
|
1
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Any questions?
|
|
2
|
DELEGATE RYBCZYNSKI: Point of order.
|
|
3
|
THF CHAIRMAN: State the point.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE RYBCZYNSKI: I suggest that the amendment
|
|
6
|
is out of order for two reasons: No. 1, because of the very
|
|
6
|
reason that Delegate Scanlan mentioned. That is a matter
|
|
7
|
of style. I can't imagine any document as important as a
|
|
8
|
constitution being composed by references to other
|
|
9
|
documents, especially when the adoption of this one will put
|
|
10
|
the other one out of business.
|
|
11
|
No. 2, what we will be doing is voting on
|
|
12
|
something which we already have in identical language. It
|
|
13
|
will be a duplicate vote. In other words, by amendment
|
|
14
|
Delegate Scanlan wants us to vote on section 3.17ab,
|
|
15
|
worded exactly the same one, no changes whatsoever. The
|
|
16
|
substance is exactly the same.
|
|
17
|
I suggest that it is out of order.
|
|
18
|
THE CHAIRMAN: The Chair would rule that the
|
|
19
|
amendment is out of order.
|
|
20
|
Any further questions?
|
|
21
|
Delegate Case.
|