|
|
10,968
|
|
1
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Very well. Delegate Weidemeyer,
|
|
2
|
do you have a question?
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: No. I have a question to
|
|
4
|
ask Delegate Scanlan.
|
|
5
|
One redeeming feature of his amendment is this:
|
|
6
|
that it will require all those who have spoken so dis-
|
|
7
|
paragingly of our old Constitution to take another look
|
|
8
|
at it.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE SCANLAN: It would have that incidental
|
|
10
|
benefit. I thank you for bringing it to my attention.
|
|
11
|
THE CHAIRMAN? : Delegate Gleason, do you have
|
|
12
|
a question?
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE GLEASON: Yes.
|
|
14
|
THE CHAIRMAN: State the question.
|
|
15
|
DELEGATE GLEASON: You understand this provision
|
|
16
|
was also amended in 1891?
|
|
17
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Scanlan.
|
|
18
|
DELEGATE SCANLAN: I would accept -- I understand
|
|
19
|
that, and the intention of the amendment is to embrace
|
|
20
|
in this constitution the provisions of section 48,
|
|
21
|
article 3, as they stand as of the date of the enactment
|