|
|
10,436
|
|
1
|
take into account the need to expend those funds as needed
|
|
2
|
to bring each child up to the maximum of his potential.
|
|
5
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Wheatley.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE WHEATLEY: Mr. Chairman, I yield one
|
|
5
|
minute to Delegate Bamberger .
|
|
6
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Bamberger.
|
|
7
|
DELEGATE BAMBERGER: Mr. Chairman, I rise in
|
|
8
|
opposition to the amendment because I am concerned that
|
|
9
|
those who speak for the amendment speak for the deletion
|
|
10
|
of Section 2, because either of their inability to con-
|
|
11
|
strue it or because of the construction which they put
|
|
12
|
upon it .
|
|
13
|
I would suggest to the members of this Committee
|
|
14
|
that before you vote upon this, you read the construction
|
|
15
|
of the amendment which appears on pages 3 and 4 of the
|
|
16
|
Majority Report. It does not speak in terms of the input
|
|
17
|
to a system, in terms of dollars spent in the education
|
|
18
|
of a child. It speaks in terms of the output.
|
|
19
|
As I understand the intent, it is that there
|
|
20
|
shall be a system of education which is equal in that it
|
|
21
|
may take one child from a cultural idea privileged
|