|
|
10,234
|
|
1
|
that we want. Let us not put ourselves in a position
|
|
2
|
where we don't permit the government to act as it must at
|
|
5
|
times away from everyon'e eyes.
|
|
4
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Schneider.
|
|
5
|
DELEGATE SCHNEIDER. Mr. Chairman, I want
|
|
6
|
to speak against 24-A. As Delegate Dukes has pointed out,
|
|
7
|
it is a step backwards. If not a step backwards, it is
|
|
8
|
a step forward. If you are in favor of the right to
|
|
9
|
know, this does nothing. It merely constitutionalizes
|
|
10
|
what we presently have, and perhaps not quite as much.
|
|
11
|
If you are against the right to know, why would
|
|
12
|
you want useless language in the Constitution? No matter
|
|
13
|
how you feel on this, there is no use putting a
|
|
14
|
toothless provision of 24-A in the Constitution.
|
|
15
|
If you are in favor of the right to know, I
|
|
16
|
think you are in favor of the right to require public
|
|
17
|
meetings. This does not do that. This says that merely
|
|
18
|
you can inspect the minutes after the meeting has been
|
|
19
|
held. I would say anyone here, whether you are for or
|
|
20
|
against the right to know, would vote against 24-A.
|
|
21
|
So I would urge you vote against the Yokum
|