10,195

1

DELEGATE PULLEN: It was suggested to me that

2

my question was not understood, and from the answer apparently

3

it wasn't.

4

DELEGATE WILLONER: The mere fact that public funds

5

are given to a private institution would not be a reason

6

for it. That is what you meant?

7

DELEGATE PULLEN: No, when MIT has 83 percent of

8

its budget from the federal government and Hopkins has

9

60 percent of its budget from the federal government, and

10

practically every educational institution in this country

11

has a large percentage of money, and when Hopkins and other

12

institutions get this kind of money, it seems to me it is

13

quite an appropriate question.

14

DELEGATE WILLONER: I agree with you. This

15

provision does not cover situations like Johns Hopkins or

16

MIT.

17

It goes to governmental agencies.

18

DELEGATE JAMES: Delegate Jett.

19

DELEGATE JETT: Would this apply to adoption

SO

records?

21

DELEGATE WILLONER: They are protected by statute's .