|
|
10,194
|
|
1
|
Nothing would have to be done. But if it did apply to
|
|
2
|
adoption records, then the legislature would have to
|
|
3
|
protect those provisions, but I am sure it is taken care
|
|
4
|
of now.
|
|
5
|
As you well know, you seal the records by
|
|
6
|
statute now. This would not be an issue because it is already
|
|
7
|
taken care of.
|
|
8
|
DELEGATE JETT: Is it your statement that any
|
|
9
|
and all records would be open to inspection unless protected
|
|
10
|
by legislative action?
|
|
11
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: Yes, that is the intention.
|
|
12
|
but it is bigger than that. The word "records" has a
|
|
13
|
judicial history. It is limited by those matters that
|
|
14
|
violate the public interest.
|
|
15
|
The word "records" constitute formal records,
|
|
16
|
and. it is limited by those matters -- it is a balance between
|
|
17
|
the public interest and the interest of the private citizen.
|
|
18
|
DELEGATE JETT: That would have to be litigated
|
|
19
|
to find out whether it was against the public interest or
|
|
20
|
not.
|
|
21
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: That is the law now, sir.
|