|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audoun,
|
Hopper,
|
Schley,
|
|
|
|
Baker,
|
Jones, of Cecil,
|
Schlosser,
|
|
|
|
Barren,
|
Keefer,
|
Scott,
|
|
|
|
Brooks,
|
Kennard,
|
Smith, of Carroll,
|
|
|
|
Carter,
|
King,
|
Smith, of Wor.,
|
|
|
|
Cunningham,
|
Markey,
|
Sneary,
|
|
|
|
Cushing-,
|
McComas,
|
Stirling,
|
|
|
|
Daniel,
|
Mullikin,
|
Stockbridge,
|
|
|
|
Davis, of Wash.,
|
Murray,
|
Swope,
|
|
|
|
Dellinger,
|
Negley,
|
Sykes,
|
|
|
|
Earle,
|
Noble,
|
Thomas,
|
|
|
|
Ecker,
|
Hyman,
|
Thruston,
|
|
|
|
Farrow,
|
Parker,
|
Todd,
|
|
|
|
Galloway,
|
Pugh,
|
Valliant,
|
|
|
|
Greene,
|
Purnell,
|
Wickard,
|
|
|
|
Hatch,
|
Ridgely,
|
Wooden — 57.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the question was decided in the negative.
Mr. Belt submitted the following amendments:
. Art. 3—Add the words; "And that no right of property,
now lawfully held in this State, ought to be destroyed or im-
paired, without compensation to the owners thereof. "
Mr. Schley called the previous question;
On the question being put, "shall the main question be
now put ?"
It was decided in the affirmative.
The question being on the adoption of the amendment sub-
mitted by Mr. Belt,
Mr. Berry, of Prince George's, demanded the yeas and nays,
The demand being sustained, the yeas and nays were called
and appeared as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFIRMATIVE.
|
|
|
|
|
Messrs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belt,
|
Dail,
|
Jones, of Sora.
|
|
|
|
Berry, of P. G.
|
Davis, of Charles,
|
Marbury,
|
|
|
|
Billingsley,
|
Edelen,
|
Mitchell,
|
|
|
|
Blackiston,
|
Harwood,
|
Miller,
|
|
|
|
Bond,
|
Henkle,
|
Morgan,
|
|
|
|
Briscoe,
|
Hodson,
|
Parran,
|
|
|
|
Brown,
|
Hollyday,
|
Peter,
|
|
|
|
Clarke,
|
Horsey,
|
Smith, of Dor.
|
|
|
|
Crawford,
|
Johnson,
|
Wilmer— 27.
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
